OZ-ENERGY-ANALYSIS.ORG - open science for the new millennium
THE STORIES | DATA | ANALYSIS | MODELS | LITERATURE | DISCUSSIONS
Status: round one; last active here Dec 2010
[fc: 30th May 2011] This work was pushed through late last year, and both the analysis and write-up will benefit from revision - eventually. Of particular note here is comment #3, which introduces the idea of 'demand remainder profiles'. Also note that initial work was done with 2009 data, and then also for 2003 (see comment #9) as needed to align with solar data. What followed from this page was the sister analysis on Simulated Concentrating Solar Thermal (CST) Farms, the development of 50% renewables scenarios and the Third Story.
The Story of the Broome to Cooktown Challenge is, in short, that we construct a hypothetical network of wind farms from Broome to Cooktown (or thereabouts), and examine how the system as a whole behaves in relation to synoptic scale weather patterns. We do this using BoM wind speed data for ~40 mostly costal stations that we have selected, and by applying a Wind Power Curve model to the wind-speed data to transform it into simulated wind farms.
In previous data work on BtCC R1 data, we established 40 BoM stations. Upon obtaining and examining the (2009) data we categorised 9 of these as poor, based on the wind speed distribution and reconsideration of station siting (using Google Earth). Of the nine alternate stations that we chose, only five came back with hour level data (remainder synoptic = 3hr-ly).
We now proceed in simulating wind farms, broken into three groups:
- the initial 31 that passed inspection
- the initial 9 that were considered problematic
- the new 5 that may act as replacements
Thus far we are simply considering the first group of 31 in order to get a starting look.
The wind speed data used here is developed in the BtCC Wind Speed Data Page. For now we are proceeding with the Round One wind speed data, as found in: BtCC_R1_BASE_hr_2009.txt.gz [332 KB] - (csv version). As at 3rd Dec, there remains some data work to do in replacing previously identified 'poor' sites with alternatives. For now we simply exclude these problematic sites from consideratio; these are:
BoM site number: 60141 31209 31210 84143 3003 5007 9178 9741 11003 index in files: 3. 8. 9. 28. 33. 34. 36. 39. 40.
The method (the Wind Power Curve model) for transforming BoM wind speed data into putative wind farm output is developed on the Reconcile Wind Farm output with BoM wind data page; and, in particular, is formalised in these Matlab scripts (which can be translated into other languages / forms, taking care to handle missing data). Following on from Simulating Wind Farms on the Eyre Peninsula, here we additionally include longitudinal correction for the diurnal bias phase parameter, as follows:
DPpD = 24; % Data Points per day
DYst = 1; % Day of Year start
CF_req = 0.35; % Capacity Factor for simulated wind farms
SC = [0.1, 30]; % Seasonal correction parameters
DC = [7, 13.9, 0.265]; % Diurnal correction parameters
% - the 2nd of these requires a longitude based adjustment
% With a vector of raw wind speed data 'wind', and longitude 'long'
DCp = 13.9 - 0.0667 * (long - 137.7);
DC(2) = DCp;
wind_cor = OzEA_wind_speed_corrections( wind, DPpD, DYst, SC, DC );
simWF = OzEA_simulate_wind_farm_output( wind_cor, CF_req );
Using data and methods as above, the 31 simulated wind farms (1 MB .txt.gz) are generated, downsampled into daily averages and plotted:
If you click the image you get a PDF where you can zoom in and pan along for a clearer view. The black line shows the day-level average of all 31 simulated wind farms. At least on first appearences, we observe a very significant level of spatial smoothing.
To start, just as a reminder, and apart from all the other caveats that go with a first pass look, this is not an engineering proposal. In particular, unless and until we learn otherwise, there is not going to a be a (large) transmission capacity between the east and the west coasts any time soon. In time the analysis here will break down into looking at more realistic configurations of component parts; for now we continue with an overall level view.
Work proceeds in the comments below.
DISCUSSION: (on BtCC wind farm simulations)
| 2 |
francis |

| 3 |
francis |

| 4 |
John Newlands |
| 5 |
francis |
| 6 |
Neil Howes |
| 7 |
Francis |
| 8 |
francis |
| 9 |
francis |

| 10 |
Leith Elder |
| 11 |
Francis |
fc - December 2010
Post Comment: