HOME

OZ-ENERGY-ANALYSIS.ORG   -   open science for the new millennium

THE STORIES   |   DATA   |   ANALYSIS   |   MODELS   |   LITERATURE   |   DISCUSSIONS

Status: round one; last active here Dec 2010

Simulated Wind Farms from Broome to Cooktown


[fc: 30th May 2011]   This work was pushed through late last year, and both the analysis and write-up will benefit from revision - eventually. Of particular note here is comment #3, which introduces the idea of 'demand remainder profiles'. Also note that initial work was done with 2009 data, and then also for 2003 (see comment #9) as needed to align with solar data. What followed from this page was the sister analysis on Simulated Concentrating Solar Thermal (CST) Farms, the development of 50% renewables scenarios and the Third Story.



ABSTRACT and INTRODUCTION

The Story of the Broome to Cooktown Challenge is, in short, that we construct a hypothetical network of wind farms from Broome to Cooktown (or thereabouts), and examine how the system as a whole behaves in relation to synoptic scale weather patterns. We do this using BoM wind speed data for ~40 mostly costal stations that we have selected, and by applying a Wind Power Curve model to the wind-speed data to transform it into simulated wind farms.

In previous data work on BtCC R1 data, we established 40 BoM stations. Upon obtaining and examining the (2009) data we categorised 9 of these as poor, based on the wind speed distribution and reconsideration of station siting (using Google Earth). Of the nine alternate stations that we chose, only five came back with hour level data (remainder synoptic = 3hr-ly).

We now proceed in simulating wind farms, broken into three groups:
- the initial 31 that passed inspection
- the initial 9 that were considered problematic
- the new 5 that may act as replacements

Thus far we are simply considering the first group of 31 in order to get a starting look.


DATA and METHODS

The wind speed data used here is developed in the BtCC Wind Speed Data Page. For now we are proceeding with the Round One wind speed data, as found in: BtCC_R1_BASE_hr_2009.txt.gz [332 KB] - (csv version). As at 3rd Dec, there remains some data work to do in replacing previously identified 'poor' sites with alternatives. For now we simply exclude these problematic sites from consideratio; these are:

 BoM site number:  60141  31209  31210  84143   3003   5007   9178   9741  11003
 index in files:      3.     8.     9.    28.    33.    34.    36.    39.    40.

The method (the Wind Power Curve model) for transforming BoM wind speed data into putative wind farm output is developed on the Reconcile Wind Farm output with BoM wind data page; and, in particular, is formalised in these Matlab scripts (which can be translated into other languages / forms, taking care to handle missing data). Following on from Simulating Wind Farms on the Eyre Peninsula, here we additionally include longitudinal correction for the diurnal bias phase parameter, as follows:

DPpD   = 24;     % Data Points per day 
DYst   =  1;     % Day of Year start
CF_req =  0.35;  % Capacity Factor for simulated wind farms
SC     = [0.1, 30];        % Seasonal correction parameters
DC     = [7, 13.9, 0.265]; %  Diurnal correction parameters
                           %  - the 2nd of these requires a longitude based adjustment
% With a vector of raw wind speed data 'wind', and longitude 'long'
DCp      = 13.9 - 0.0667 * (long - 137.7);
DC(2)    = DCp;
wind_cor = OzEA_wind_speed_corrections( wind,  DPpD, DYst, SC, DC );
simWF	 = OzEA_simulate_wind_farm_output( wind_cor, CF_req );

ANALYSIS and RESULTS

Using data and methods as above, the 31 simulated wind farms (1 MB .txt.gz) are generated, downsampled into daily averages and plotted:

Initial look at BtCC simulations

If you click the image you get a PDF where you can zoom in and pan along for a clearer view. The black line shows the day-level average of all 31 simulated wind farms. At least on first appearences, we observe a very significant level of spatial smoothing.


REMARKS

To start, just as a reminder, and apart from all the other caveats that go with a first pass look, this is not an engineering proposal. In particular, unless and until we learn otherwise, there is not going to a be a (large) transmission capacity between the east and the west coasts any time soon. In time the analysis here will break down into looking at more realistic configurations of component parts; for now we continue with an overall level view.

Work proceeds in the comments below.



DISCUSSION: (on BtCC wind farm simulations)


2

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0002

francis
Subject: State by state view of simulated wind farms
Date: 2010-12-16 (at 21:01:50)


Here is a state-by-state view of the simulated wind farm data, at the day-to-day level. Each state (WA, SA, TAS, VIC, NSW & QLD) is derived as the average of the simulated wind farms from that state (4,9,4,5,6 & 4) respectively, and these traces are treated equally in generating the average (and so the average is a little different to the one given in the head post). The figure can be viewed in more detail by linking through to the pdf and then zooming in.

simulated WF output by state

With an average output of 0.35 (the imposed capacity factor) it is noteworthy that the the overall daily average sits above 0.2 most of the time. Of course, the electricity system has to match supply and demand ALL the time, and so we will shortly move to a different way of viewing this data (demand remainder profiles).

Note that before putting too much effort into analysing the spatial smoothing here, we will bring in the solar data. As this proceeds the task will turn to an optimisation problem with the aim of choosing configurations of Wind and Solar farms that given the 'best' overall smoothing.

3

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0003

francis
Subject: base renewable supply
Date: 2010-12-18 (at 00:04:26)


Current thinking is to look at the renewable supply in terms of what we call a demand remainder profile. Here we subtract renewable supply from overall demand to get the 'demand remainder', and then instead of plotting this as a time series (as above), we add up the fraction of the time that the demand remainder is above a given value to get:

demand remainder profiles SA 2009

Here are equivalent plots for TAS, VIC, NSW and QLD.

The blue curve shows the full historical demand for 2009, and the base supply, intermediate supply and peaking supply requirements are clearly seen. The red curve shows the demand profile after one half of the power overall has come from the simulated wind farms in the state, while the dashed black trace has half the power coming from the entire Broome to Cooktown network. Unsurprisingly, the greater level of spatial smoothing gives a better result.

What is especially interesting here is the way renewable power (at the 50% level) is displacing the traditional "baseload", leaving somewhat elongated intermediate and peak supply phases. Thus, we will speak of base renewable supply when dealing with high renewable penetration.

In the 'traditional' mode, the base load/supply runs constantly, with intermediate supply coming in and out on a daily cycle, and with a requirement for more occasional peaking supply. With a base renewable supply, what remains need not (by working hypothesis) impose hugely different needs on intermediate and peaking infrastructure, it may just alter the temporal behaviour.

For the time being we continue to work on the 'base', and will in time and in turn look at the intermediate and peaking parts of the problem.

4

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0004

John Newlands
Subject: artefact of time series smoothing
Date: 2010-12-18 (at 07:21:52)


If I understand this right the second time series graph is a more smoothed version of the first. The lower bound went from say 0.05 to 0.1 perhaps representing firm wind power or capacity credit. A third smoothing might increase the lower bound even further. Perhaps the lower bound could get to 0.2 with enough iterations. However it doesn't remove raw data as low as 0.05 which is crucial to electrical supply.

An reverse analogy is Christmas retail sales. We want monthly moving averages not quarterly to make the December spike more pronounced.

5

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0005

francis
Subject: Re #4 - smoothing
Date: 2010-12-18 (at 12:07:06)


John, there is no additional smoothing beyond that provided by the averaging.
That is: there are 31 simulated wind farms, with hour-level data (as provided), and in order to get a 'look' at the whole lot I have down-sampled to day-level. These traces are plotted in the head post, along with the total of the lot (all normalised into [0,1]). In #2 above the same data has been added at the state level, and then added into an overall (black) trace, thus giving equal weighting to each state. I do not see this as adding an extra level of smoothing.

It remains the case, as you point out, that looking at the data at the hour-level would show more variability. How to look at this?

The demand remainder profiles, as given in #3 above are our answer, and this has been calculated with the hour-level data.

6

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0006

Neil Howes
Subject: wind baseload
Date: 2011-01-23 (at 19:34:21)


Francis,
This is a valuable contribution to understanding limitations of wind to providing a significant portion of future electricity. Comparing the difference between state and national(all 31 sites) residuals gives a good indication of the magnitude of interstate grid transfer capacity. For example in NSW the difference between NSW and national wind residuals is about 1,000MW. This would be the additional interstate grid capacity that would be required to take advantage of a national wind generating capacity. A larger grid capacity would be required to take advantage of existing or additional hydro capacity and to use both hydro and OCGT peaking capacity or to use concentrating solar power for intermediate and peak power most efficiently.

7

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0007

Francis
Subject: wind base-supply
Date: 2011-01-23 (at 20:46:48)


Neil - pleased to have you back around. There will be a whole lot more soon when I get this Solar Data sorted out - almost there.

Just a point of clarification; this may sound semantic, but I consider it to be important. You give as your subject "wind baseload", but the wind power is not load, it is supply. And since it is supply without a control knob, it is part of base supply.

Also, I hope before too long to process into the analysis replacements for 5 of the 9 problem sites that were excluded.

8

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0008

francis
Subject: need 2003-4-5 versions
Date: 2011-02-25 (at 04:01:37)


What needs to be sorted fairly soon (while the third story happens) is wind data for the 2003-4-5 years, to align with the best of the solar data

with that data, this page comes back to life

9

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0009

francis
Subject: Simulated wind farms for 2003
Date: 2011-03-03 (at 01:03:10)


With some differences in the BoM stations from the 2009 work above (see wind data), here are the 30 simulated wind farms (0.3 MB gziped text file) for 2003. As for 2009, a simple day-level plot, as previously, with an overall average (black trace) shows much spatial smoothing:



Here are the values of the overall day-level average.

Now these 2003 simulated wind farms are established, it's back to the solar simulations for a bit, and then on with Fifty percent Renewable Scenarios.

10

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0010

Leith Elder
Subject: Simulated Wind Farms from Broome to Cooktown
Date: 2011-04-25 (at 16:58:00)


If anyone is interested, some time ago I constructed a simulation model which uses actual output data at 5 minute intervals from all of the 22 current windfarms that have data publicly available and replicates them cookie cutter style across the whole of Australia by the simple mechanism of time shifting the data to represent weather systems passing from west to east. The model now has 21 months actual data and shows substantial smoothing but still indicates periods of extremely low output. I will be interesated to compare my models outputs with the outputs of this highly theoretical model.

I have also supplemented the model with confidential data from two solar farms in NSW and found very little improvement in these low output periods underlining the need for substantial backup generation or else storage.

In addition I have applied the same technique to Ireland's windfarms and Canadas windfarms and obtained strikingly similar results.

11

OzEA_ABTCCWFS0011

Francis
Subject: Re #10 [Leith Elder] -- periods of extremely low output
Date: 2011-04-26 (at 20:23:39)


Hello Leith, yes, I'm interested!

How to get a grip on the apparent difference in conclusions?

Perhaps that you are working at 5min intervals compared to my hour-level could be key?

It can be very productive to have the work challenged, and I would appreciate it greatly if you are able to provide detail on the frequency and extent of the low-output periods you assert.

Please ask if there are aspects of the work posted here for which you cannot find the underpinning data and/or adequate explanation of methods.

Also, I guess we must have very different understandings as to what "theoretical" work looks like - it is not a characterisation I would apply here.


--
fc - [27th Apr] Leith Elder and myself are having some very useful discussion off-line. At some point one or both of us will report back here, but perhaps not for several weeks.

[Show Full Lists]


Post Comment:

A name or alias, email and concise subject are required. Your email will not be abused.
Comments are required to be polite and on topic (commenting etiquette)

Name:*
Email:*
Website:
Subject:*
What is the longhand for 'Oz'? :*



fc - December 2010